chr16-19115489-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001034841.4(ITPRIPL2):c.1028C>G(p.Ala343Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000275 in 1,454,326 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001034841.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITPRIPL2 | ENST00000381440.5 | c.1028C>G | p.Ala343Gly | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 1 | 6 | NM_001034841.4 | ENSP00000370849.3 | ||
ITPRIPL2 | ENST00000566735.1 | n.1042C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | 2 | |||||
ENSG00000261427 | ENST00000564808.6 | n.418+554C>G | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 5 | 4 | |||||
ENSG00000261427 | ENST00000568526.1 | n.211+704C>G | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 4 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000123 AC: 3AN: 244228Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000753 AC XY: 1AN XY: 132870
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000275 AC: 4AN: 1454326Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000414 AC XY: 3AN XY: 723848
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.1028C>G (p.A343G) alteration is located in exon 1 (coding exon 1) of the ITPRIPL2 gene. This alteration results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 1028, causing the alanine (A) at amino acid position 343 to be replaced by a glycine (G). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at