chr16-2053386-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.270G>A(p.Gln90=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000182 in 1,591,418 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000018 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
TSC2
NM_000548.5 synonymous
NM_000548.5 synonymous
Scores
1
3
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.55
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).
BP6
Variant 16-2053386-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2053386-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 467958.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.55 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 26 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | NM_000548.5 | c.270G>A | p.Gln90= | synonymous_variant | 4/42 | ENST00000219476.9 | NP_000539.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | ENST00000219476.9 | c.270G>A | p.Gln90= | synonymous_variant | 4/42 | 5 | NM_000548.5 | ENSP00000219476 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152264Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152264
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000237 AC: 5AN: 210706Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000176 AC XY: 2AN XY: 113866
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
210706
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
113866
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000181 AC: 26AN: 1439154Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000126 AC XY: 9AN XY: 713776
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
26
AN:
1439154
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
713776
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152264Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74384
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152264
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74384
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
4
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Aug 25, 2023 | - - |
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 18, 2023 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 26, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | TSC2: BP7 - |
TSC2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 04, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 28, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at