chr16-2053425-T-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_ModerateBP7
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.309T>A(p.Ala103Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A103A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- tuberous sclerosisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
 - tuberous sclerosis 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
 - lymphangioleiomyomatosisInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
 - tuberous sclerosis complexInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
 
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  Cov.: 33 
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF:  0.00  AC: 0AN: 1430626Hom.:  0  Cov.: 31 AF XY:  0.00  AC XY: 0AN XY: 708730 
GnomAD4 genome  Cov.: 33 
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome    Benign:1 
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at