chr16-2071830-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4BP6
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):āc.1993C>Gā(p.Pro665Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000376 in 1,596,926 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P665P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152106Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000236 AC: 5AN: 211494Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000258 AC XY: 3AN XY: 116202
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000277 AC: 4AN: 1444820Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000279 AC XY: 2AN XY: 717236
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152106Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74306
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Uncertain:1Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Uncertain:1
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at