chr16-2084268-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.4046C>T(p.Ala1349Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000036 in 1,608,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A1349T) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | NM_000548.5 | c.4046C>T | p.Ala1349Val | missense_variant | 34/42 | ENST00000219476.9 | NP_000539.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | ENST00000219476.9 | c.4046C>T | p.Ala1349Val | missense_variant | 34/42 | 5 | NM_000548.5 | ENSP00000219476.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000375 AC: 9AN: 240078Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000229 AC XY: 3AN XY: 130776
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000378 AC: 55AN: 1456720Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000345 AC XY: 25AN XY: 724256
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74372
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 03, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | May 31, 2023 | The TSC2 c.4046C>T (p.Ala1349Val) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.011% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The in silico tool REVEL is inconclusive about a pathogenic or benign effect of this variant on protein function, and to our knowledge functional studies have not been performed. This variant has been reported in an individual with tuberous sclerosis complex who also harbored a second missense variant in TSC2 (LOVD database). The phase of these variants is unknown. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 23, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22703879) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 12, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 12, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at