chr16-2084438-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.4216G>A(p.Asp1406Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000329 in 1,609,344 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D1406Y) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | NM_000548.5 | c.4216G>A | p.Asp1406Asn | missense_variant | 34/42 | ENST00000219476.9 | NP_000539.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | ENST00000219476.9 | c.4216G>A | p.Asp1406Asn | missense_variant | 34/42 | 5 | NM_000548.5 | ENSP00000219476.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000540 AC: 13AN: 240830Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000457 AC XY: 6AN XY: 131380
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000302 AC: 44AN: 1457148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000276 AC XY: 20AN XY: 724672
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74352
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Aug 20, 2024 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2022 | TSC2: BP4 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 14, 2021 | - - |
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Jul 22, 2021 | The TSC2 c.4216G>A (p.Asp1406Asn) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.017% gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/16-2134439-G-A). Six of seven in silico tools predict a benign effect of this variant on protein function (BP4), but to our knowledge these predictions have not been confirmed by functional assays. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as of uncertain significance based on the ACMG/AMP criteria: BP4. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 29, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at