chr16-2086186-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.4663-7C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000267 in 1,612,372 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- tuberous sclerosisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- tuberous sclerosis 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
- lymphangioleiomyomatosisInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- tuberous sclerosis complexInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152118Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000482 AC: 12AN: 249092 AF XY: 0.0000665 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000281 AC: 41AN: 1460254Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000385 AC XY: 28AN XY: 726430 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152118Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74314 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:3
This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
- -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at