chr16-2114831-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_001009944.3(PKD1):​c.2192C>T​(p.Pro731Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000251 in 1,353,094 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P731P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00093 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PKD1
NM_001009944.3 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.237

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PKD1 (HGNC:9008): (polycystin 1, transient receptor potential channel interacting) This gene encodes a member of the polycystin protein family. The encoded glycoprotein contains a large N-terminal extracellular region, multiple transmembrane domains and a cytoplasmic C-tail. It is an integral membrane protein that functions as a regulator of calcium permeable cation channels and intracellular calcium homoeostasis. It is also involved in cell-cell/matrix interactions and may modulate G-protein-coupled signal-transduction pathways. It plays a role in renal tubular development, and mutations in this gene cause autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease type 1 (ADPKD1). ADPKD1 is characterized by the growth of fluid-filled cysts that replace normal renal tissue and result in end-stage renal failure. Splice variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. Also, six pseudogenes, closely linked in a known duplicated region on chromosome 16p, have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
PKD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • polycystic kidney disease 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Caroli disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 5 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 3 benign, 6 uncertain in NM_001009944.3
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013061583).
BP6
Variant 16-2114831-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2114831-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 586256.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000933 (142/152260) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00298 (124/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00256. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 69 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PKD1NM_001009944.3 linkc.2192C>T p.Pro731Leu missense_variant Exon 11 of 46 ENST00000262304.9 NP_001009944.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PKD1ENST00000262304.9 linkc.2192C>T p.Pro731Leu missense_variant Exon 11 of 46 1 NM_001009944.3 ENSP00000262304.4 P98161-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000933
AC:
142
AN:
152142
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00299
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000257
AC:
31
AN:
120558
AF XY:
0.000170
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00251
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000467
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000212
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000264
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000165
AC:
198
AN:
1200834
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
19
AF XY:
0.000143
AC XY:
86
AN XY:
599996
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00363
AC:
99
AN:
27248
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000367
AC:
13
AN:
35428
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
24010
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000862
AC:
3
AN:
34806
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
75330
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000595
AC:
2
AN:
33596
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000267
AC:
1
AN:
3748
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000776
AC:
71
AN:
915090
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000174
AC:
9
AN:
51578
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000933
AC:
142
AN:
152260
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000927
AC XY:
69
AN XY:
74448
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00298
AC:
124
AN:
41560
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000654
AC:
10
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000103
AC:
7
AN:
67972
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.493
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8
16
23
31
39
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00114
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00111

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Apr 03, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 05, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Bladder exstrophy-epispadias-cloacal extrophy complex Uncertain:1
-
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Johns Hopkins School Of Medicine
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Nov 22, 2021
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Polycystic kidney disease Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The PKD1 p.Pro731Leu variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the COGR, or LOVD 3.0 databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs979342927) as “NA”, ClinVar (classified benign by Athena Diagnostics), and ADPKD Mutation Database (as likely neutral). The variant was identified in control databases in 60 of 146384 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0004 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 43 of 14788 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Other in 1 of 4278 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 13 of 23684 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), European Non-Finnish in 1 of 59328 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), East Asian in 2 of 11492 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001); it not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. In addition we cannot be certain that data from control databases is specific to PKD1 and not from one of the six PKD1 pseudogenes. The p.Pro731 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory criteria to be classified as benign. -

PKD1-related disorder Benign:1
Dec 04, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.067
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.62
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
CADD
Benign
0.93
DANN
Benign
0.70
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.25
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.4
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.5
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.16
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.55
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.044
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.013
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
N;N
PhyloP100
0.24
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.013
Sift
Benign
0.47
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.88
T;T
Polyphen
0.084
B;B
Vest4
0.051
MutPred
0.33
Loss of disorder (P = 0.0224);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0224);
MVP
0.36
ClinPred
0.0016
T
GERP RS
-2.4
Varity_R
0.023
gMVP
0.20
Mutation Taster
=62/38
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs979342927; hg19: chr16-2164832; API