chr16-2116537-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001009944.3(PKD1):​c.1714C>T​(p.Pro572Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00624 in 1,530,406 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 550 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.032 ( 306 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0034 ( 244 hom. )

Consequence

PKD1
NM_001009944.3 missense

Scores

1
17

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.733
Variant links:
Genes affected
PKD1 (HGNC:9008): (polycystin 1, transient receptor potential channel interacting) This gene encodes a member of the polycystin protein family. The encoded glycoprotein contains a large N-terminal extracellular region, multiple transmembrane domains and a cytoplasmic C-tail. It is an integral membrane protein that functions as a regulator of calcium permeable cation channels and intracellular calcium homoeostasis. It is also involved in cell-cell/matrix interactions and may modulate G-protein-coupled signal-transduction pathways. It plays a role in renal tubular development, and mutations in this gene cause autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease type 1 (ADPKD1). ADPKD1 is characterized by the growth of fluid-filled cysts that replace normal renal tissue and result in end-stage renal failure. Splice variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. Also, six pseudogenes, closely linked in a known duplicated region on chromosome 16p, have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0021684766).
BP6
Variant 16-2116537-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2116537-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 256927.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-2116537-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr16-2116537-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.108 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PKD1NM_001009944.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1714C>T p.Pro572Ser missense_variant 8/46 ENST00000262304.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PKD1ENST00000262304.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1714C>T p.Pro572Ser missense_variant 8/461 NM_001009944.3 P5P98161-1
PKD1ENST00000423118.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1714C>T p.Pro572Ser missense_variant 8/461 A2P98161-3
PKD1ENST00000488185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.472+952C>T intron_variant 5
PKD1ENST00000568591.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.*42C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 4/122

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0320
AC:
4873
AN:
152158
Hom.:
306
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.111
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000691
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0263
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00784
AC:
1316
AN:
167828
Hom.:
67
AF XY:
0.00557
AC XY:
509
AN XY:
91384
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.117
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00677
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000124
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000382
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00344
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00339
AC:
4676
AN:
1378130
Hom.:
244
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00288
AC XY:
1970
AN XY:
683460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.113
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00748
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000912
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000150
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000244
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00822
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0320
AC:
4880
AN:
152276
Hom.:
306
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0308
AC XY:
2293
AN XY:
74450
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.111
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000691
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0260
Alfa
AF:
0.00967
Hom.:
21
Bravo
AF:
0.0364
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0981
AC:
422
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000474
AC:
4
ExAC
AF:
0.00713
AC:
836
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00520
AC:
18
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Polycystic kidney disease, adult type Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMay 23, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJun 02, 2020- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 26, 2019This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22383692, 22008521, 17574468, 11967008) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Polycystic kidney disease Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The PKD1 p.Pro572Ser variant was identified in 7 of 788 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.009) from French, Spanish and North American individuals or families with ADPKD, occurring in the homozygous state in some probands (Bataille 2011, Rossetti 2002, Garcia-Gonzalez 2007, Rossetti 2012). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs149022148) as “NA”, ADPKD Mutation Database (classification Likely Neutral), and COSMIC (in an adenocarcinoma- large intestine), and not in the Clinvitae, ClinVar, GeneInsight COGR, MutDB, PKD1-LOVD, and PKD1-LOVD 3.0 databases. The variant was identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 204 of 5012 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0407), HAP-MAP populations: -AFR in 194 of 1322 chromosomes (frequency: 0.1467) and AMR in 10 of 694 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0144), NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project in 4 of 8440 (frequency: 0.0005) European American alleles and in 422 of 4300 African American alleles (frequency: 0.0981), and in the Exome Aggregation Consortium database (March 14 2016) in 382 of 18478 chromosomes (frequency 0.02) in the following populations: African in 360 (13 homozygous) of 1826 chromosomes (frequency: 0.1972), Latino in 16 of 680 chromosomes (frequency: 0.02353), Other in 1 of 174 chromosomes (frequency: 0006), European (Non-Finnish) in 4 of 6948 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0006), and South Asian in 1 of 8022 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0001), but was not seen in East Asian and Finnish populations, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant. The p.Pro572 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.64
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.80
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.18
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.77
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.85
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.054
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.70
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0022
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.4
M;M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.34
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.70
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.017
Sift
Benign
0.41
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.52
T;T
Polyphen
0.18
B;B
Vest4
0.43
MVP
0.61
ClinPred
0.0089
T
GERP RS
1.8
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.034
gMVP
0.55

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149022148; hg19: chr16-2166538; API