chr16-2135583-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001009944.3(PKD1):c.107C>A(p.Pro36His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0219 in 1,068,452 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 292 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001009944.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant polycystic kidney diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- polycystic kidney disease 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- autosomal recessive polycystic kidney diseaseInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Caroli diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001009944.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PKD1 | NM_001009944.3 | MANE Select | c.107C>A | p.Pro36His | missense | Exon 1 of 46 | NP_001009944.3 | ||
| PKD1 | NM_000296.4 | c.107C>A | p.Pro36His | missense | Exon 1 of 46 | NP_000287.4 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PKD1 | ENST00000262304.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.107C>A | p.Pro36His | missense | Exon 1 of 46 | ENSP00000262304.4 | ||
| PKD1 | ENST00000423118.5 | TSL:1 | c.107C>A | p.Pro36His | missense | Exon 1 of 46 | ENSP00000399501.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0165 AC: 2436AN: 147602Hom.: 40 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0228 AC: 20963AN: 920748Hom.: 252 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.0227 AC XY: 9785AN XY: 430858 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0165 AC: 2436AN: 147704Hom.: 40 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0169 AC XY: 1217AN XY: 71970 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Variant summary: PKD1 c.107C>A (p.Pro36His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.022 in 1068452 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 292 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in PKD1 causing PKD1-Biallelic Autosomal Recessive Polycystic Kidney Disease phenotype. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.107C>A in individuals affected with PKD1-Biallelic Autosomal Recessive Polycystic Kidney Disease and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 256895). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.
not provided Benign:2
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22008521, 18640754)
Polycystic kidney disease, adult type Benign:1
Polycystic kidney disease Benign:1
The PKD1 p.Pro36His variant was identified in 20 of 616 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.03) from individuals or families with ADPKD (with or without family history), and was not identified in 150 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Reed 2008, Bataille 2011, Peltola 2005, Rossetti 2012). Reed et al. could not classify the variant however the conservation score associated the variant with some evolutionary variability (Reed 2008). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs560049593) as “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by ARUP, and likely benign by Prevention Genetics and GeneDx), and ADPKD Mutation Database (classified as likely neutral). The variant was not identified in PKD1-LOVD or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 398 of 26042 chromosomes (3 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.02 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 44 of 8250 chromosomes (freq: 0.005), Other in 18 of 744 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), Latino in 2 of 396 chromosomes (freq: 0.005), European Non-Finnish in 266 of 13680 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 224 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), European Finnish in 67 of 1126 chromosomes (freq: 0.06); it was not observed in the East Asian, and South Asian populations. The p.Pro36 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact of the variant His to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory criteria to be classified as benign.
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease Benign:1
PKD1-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at