chr16-23388929-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 2P and 7B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBP7
The NM_153603.4(COG7):c.2304G>A(p.Val768=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000372 in 1,613,986 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V768V) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153603.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COG7 | NM_153603.4 | c.2304G>A | p.Val768= | synonymous_variant | 17/17 | ENST00000307149.10 | |
COG7 | XM_017023870.2 | c.2109G>A | p.Val703= | synonymous_variant | 17/17 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COG7 | ENST00000307149.10 | c.2304G>A | p.Val768= | synonymous_variant | 17/17 | 1 | NM_153603.4 | P1 | |
COG7 | ENST00000566364.1 | n.651G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/3 | 2 | ||||
COG7 | ENST00000561854.1 | c.*396G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 4/4 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1461842Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727214
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74322
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
COG7 congenital disorder of glycosylation Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | May 29, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at