chr16-23607914-A-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_024675.4(PALB2):c.3300T>G(p.Thr1100Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0277 in 1,614,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 732 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.025 ( 72 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.028 ( 660 hom. )
Consequence
PALB2
NM_024675.4 synonymous
NM_024675.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.305
Genes affected
PALB2 (HGNC:26144): (partner and localizer of BRCA2) This gene encodes a protein that may function in tumor suppression. This protein binds to and colocalizes with the breast cancer 2 early onset protein (BRCA2) in nuclear foci and likely permits the stable intranuclear localization and accumulation of BRCA2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 16-23607914-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-23607914-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 126730.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-23607914-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr16-23607914-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.305 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (MID) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0558 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALB2 | NM_024675.4 | c.3300T>G | p.Thr1100Thr | synonymous_variant | 12/13 | ENST00000261584.9 | NP_078951.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALB2 | ENST00000261584.9 | c.3300T>G | p.Thr1100Thr | synonymous_variant | 12/13 | 1 | NM_024675.4 | ENSP00000261584.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0254 AC: 3870AN: 152138Hom.: 72 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
3870
AN:
152138
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0237 AC: 5950AN: 251488Hom.: 104 AF XY: 0.0248 AC XY: 3367AN XY: 135920
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
5950
AN:
251488
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3367
AN XY:
135920
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0279 AC: 40855AN: 1461824Hom.: 660 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0282 AC XY: 20473AN XY: 727224
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
40855
AN:
1461824
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
20473
AN XY:
727224
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0254 AC: 3865AN: 152256Hom.: 72 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0253 AC XY: 1885AN XY: 74444
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
3865
AN:
152256
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1885
AN XY:
74444
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:23
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 08, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 31, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Aug 24, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Feb 23, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | curation | Leiden Open Variation Database | Aug 07, 2019 | Curators: Marc Tischkowitz, Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitters to LOVD: Marc Tischkowitz, Maximiliano Zeballos. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | case-control | Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre | Jun 01, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast;C1835817:Fanconi anemia complementation group N;C3150547:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Aug 06, 2021 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group N Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The PALB2 p.Thr1100= variant was identified in 196 of 6158 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.03) from individuals or families with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, or malignant melanoma (Aoude 2014, Erkko 2007, Rahman 2007, Kluska 2017, Catucci 2014). The variant was also identified in ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Prevention Genetics, and three other submitters; and as likely benign by three submitters), LOVD 3.0 (20x as not affecting function), and then Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (5 entries classified as “probably no pathogenicity”). The variant was not identified in Cosmic or the MutDB databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 6664 of 282864 chromosomes (112 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.02, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Ashkenazi Jewish in 363 of 10370 chromosomes (freq: 0.04), European (Non-Finnish) in 3775 of 129186 chromosomes (freq: 0.03), Other in 200 of 7226 chromosomes (freq: 0.03), South Asian in 815 of 30616 chromosomes (freq: 0.03), European (Finnish) in 499 of 25118 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), African in 421 of 24958 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), Latino in 589 of 35440 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), and East Asian in 2 of 19950 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001). The p.Thr1100= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at