chr16-23635127-T-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_024675.4(PALB2):c.1419A>C(p.Pro473=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000592 in 1,614,242 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00036 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
PALB2
NM_024675.4 synonymous
NM_024675.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.312
Genes affected
PALB2 (HGNC:26144): (partner and localizer of BRCA2) This gene encodes a protein that may function in tumor suppression. This protein binds to and colocalizes with the breast cancer 2 early onset protein (BRCA2) in nuclear foci and likely permits the stable intranuclear localization and accumulation of BRCA2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 16-23635127-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-23635127-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 126601.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-23635127-T-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr16-23635127-T-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.312 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALB2 | NM_024675.4 | c.1419A>C | p.Pro473= | synonymous_variant | 4/13 | ENST00000261584.9 | NP_078951.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALB2 | ENST00000261584.9 | c.1419A>C | p.Pro473= | synonymous_variant | 4/13 | 1 | NM_024675.4 | ENSP00000261584 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00286 AC: 435AN: 152240Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
435
AN:
152240
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000800 AC: 201AN: 251164Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000626 AC XY: 85AN XY: 135732
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
201
AN:
251164
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
135732
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000356 AC: 520AN: 1461884Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000314 AC XY: 228AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
520
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
228
AN XY:
727242
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00286 AC: 436AN: 152358Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00289 AC XY: 215AN XY: 74512
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
436
AN:
152358
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
215
AN XY:
74512
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:22
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 16, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 20, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 21, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Jun 18, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Jan 16, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 13, 2015 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 03, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | curation | Leiden Open Variation Database | May 13, 2019 | Curators: Marc Tischkowitz, Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitter to LOVD: Marc Tischkowitz. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Dec 01, 2015 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 11, 2016 | Variant summary: The PALB2 c.1419A>C (p.Pro473Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving a non-conserved nucleotide with 5/5 splice prediction tools predicting no significant impact on splicing and alteration to an ESE binding site, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC with an allele frequency of 129/121282 (1/939, 2 homozygotes), predominantly in the African cohort, 121/10362 (1/85, 2 homozygotes), which significantly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic PALB2 variant of 1/6397. Therefore, suggesting the variant is a common polymorphism found in population(s) of African origin. In addition, multiple reputable clinical laboratories cite the variant as "likely benign/benign." Therefore, taking all available lines of evidence into considearation, the variant of interest has been classified as Benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2024 | PALB2: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Dec 19, 2022 | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The PALB2 p.Pro473= variant was identified in 4 of 3246 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast cancer and was not identified in 2082 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Damiola 2015, Ding 2011, Hellebrand 2011, Sauty de Chalon 2010). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs62625275), ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx, Invitae, Color Genomics, Laboratory Corporation of America; as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Counsyl, GSLUOC, PALB2 database), Clinvitae (conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity), Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, or LOVD 3.0 databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 270 of 276902 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.001 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 242 of 24034 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), “Other” in 1 of 6464 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 21 of 34414 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European in 4 of 126400 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), and South Asian in 2 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or Finnish populations. The p.Pro473= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at