chr16-23636231-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate

The NM_024675.4(PALB2):​c.315G>C​(p.Glu105Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000328 in 1,613,684 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E105Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000036 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PALB2
NM_024675.4 missense

Scores

4
15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:12B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.566
Variant links:
Genes affected
PALB2 (HGNC:26144): (partner and localizer of BRCA2) This gene encodes a protein that may function in tumor suppression. This protein binds to and colocalizes with the breast cancer 2 early onset protein (BRCA2) in nuclear foci and likely permits the stable intranuclear localization and accumulation of BRCA2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.08226743).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PALB2NM_024675.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.315G>C p.Glu105Asp missense_variant 4/13 ENST00000261584.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PALB2ENST00000261584.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.315G>C p.Glu105Asp missense_variant 4/131 NM_024675.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00000658
AC:
1
AN:
152010
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000239
AC:
6
AN:
251116
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000295
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
135698
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000352
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000356
AC:
52
AN:
1461674
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000371
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
727100
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000387
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00000658
AC:
1
AN:
152010
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000135
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74232
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000139
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000227
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.0000247
AC:
3

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:12Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJun 28, 2023This missense variant replaces glutamic acid with aspartic acid at codon 105 of the PALB2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in 2 individuals affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 22241545, 30651582) and in an individual affected with childhood-onset leukemia (PMID: 31721781). This variant also has been reported in several cancer case-control studies. In two breast cancer case-control studies, this variant has been detected in 7/7051 female breast cancer cases and 5/11241 unaffected controls (PMID: 30287823) and in 4/60466 cancer cases and 1/53461 unaffected controls (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID PALB2_010032). This variant has been detected in 2/1005 pancreatic cancer cases and 6/23705 unaffected individuals (PMID: 32980694) and 2/7636 prostate cancer cases and 1/12366 unaffected individuals (PMID: 31214711). This variant has been identified in 7/282494 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 21, 2023The p.E105D variant (also known as c.315G>C), located in coding exon 4 of the PALB2 gene, results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 315. The glutamic acid at codon 105 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration has been reported in multiple unique cohorts of breast and/or ovarian cancer patients, but has also been reported in healthy control populations (Tischkowitz M et al. Hum. Mutat. 2012 Apr;33:674-80; Decker B et al. J Med Genet, 2017 11;54:732-741; Momozawa Y et al. Nat Commun. 2018 10;9:4083; Krivokuca A et al. J Hum Genet, 2019 Apr;64:281-290). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 24, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsSep 21, 2017- -
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2023PALB2: BP4 -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenDec 30, 2022PM2_SUP, BP4 -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedcurationLeiden Open Variation DatabaseMay 13, 2019Curators: Marc Tischkowitz, Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitters to LOVD: Marc Tischkowitz, Melissa DeRycke, Yukihide Momozawa. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 10, 2021In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with breast cancer, one of whom also had ovarian cancer but harbored a BRCA1 pathogenic variant, pancreatic cancer, and in unaffected controls (Tischkowitz 2012, Decker 2017, Momozawa 2018, Krivokuca 2019, Mizukami 2020); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32980694, 30651582, 28779002, 30404791, 30287823, 22241545) -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 15, 2024Variant summary: PALB2 c.315G>C (p.Glu105Asp) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.4e-05 in 251116 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.315G>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer (e.g., Tischkowitz_2012, Krivokuca_2019), pancreatic cancer (e.g., Mizukami_2020), and ovarian cancer (e.g., Prokofyeva_2023, Krivokuca_2019). Additionally one Japanese case-control association study on 7,051 unselected breast cancer cases and 11,241 female controls showed no association of this variant with breast cancer along with a final assessment as benign (Momozawa_2018); conversely, another Japanese case-control study on 1,005 pancreatic cancer patients and 23,705 controls reported the variant with an odds ratio of 7.9 (95% CI: 0.8-44.1; Mizukami_2020). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with PALB2-associated cancers. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported (BRCA1 c.1054G>T, p.Glu352*) in a 46 year old with HBOC and a family history of breast cancer, providing supporting evidence for a benign role (Krivocuca_2019). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 30651582, 30287823, 22241545, 37013556, 28779002, 32980694). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 126718). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Familial cancer of breast;C1835817:Fanconi anemia complementation group N;C3150547:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsApr 14, 2022- -
PALB2-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 12, 2024The PALB2 c.315G>C variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Glu105Asp. This variant was reported in individuals with breast, ovarian, pancreatic, or biliary tract cancers; however, this variant was also documented in control individuals (supplementary data 1, Momozawa et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 30287823; Table S6, Mizukami et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32980694; Table S2, Okawa et al. 2023. PubMed ID: 36243179; Prokofyeva et al. 2023. PubMed ID: 37013556). This variant was also documented in an individual from a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) cohort; however, this individual also carried a nonsense BRCA1 variant (subject #ID347 in Table A.1 and Table A.2, Krivokuca et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 34284872). This variant is reported in 0.0050% of alleles in individuals of East Asian descent in gnomAD and is interpreted as uncertain significance in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/126718/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 21, 2024This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 105 of the PALB2 protein (p.Glu105Asp). This variant is present in population databases (rs515726108, gnomAD 0.005%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 22241545, 30287823, 30651582, 34284872). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 126718). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.091
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.36
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.30
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.83
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.90
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.12
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.51
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.022
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.082
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.6
M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.25
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.5
N
REVEL
Benign
0.025
Sift
Uncertain
0.022
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.034
D
Polyphen
0.019
B
Vest4
0.11
MutPred
0.14
Gain of sheet (P = 0.0827);
MVP
0.34
MPC
0.057
ClinPred
0.044
T
GERP RS
0.15
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.052
gMVP
0.047

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs515726108; hg19: chr16-23647552; API