chr16-28477458-T-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_001042432.2(CLN3):c.*58A>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000398 in 1,609,582 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000042 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CLN3
NM_001042432.2 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0001408

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.194

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CLN3 (HGNC:2074): (CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein, battenin) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in lysosomal function. Mutations in this, as well as other neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinosis (CLN) genes, cause neurodegenerative diseases commonly known as Batten disease or collectively known as neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs). Many alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CLN3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

inherited retinal dystrophy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health

CLN3 links:

ENSG00000261832 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000261832 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.0000419 (61/1457346) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00151 (60/39686). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00121. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 36 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CLN3	NM_001042432.2 link	c.*58A>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 16 of 16	ENST00000636147.2	NP_001035897.1	Q13286-1A0A024QZB8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CLN3	ENST00000636147.2 link	c.*58A>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 16 of 16	1	NM_001042432.2	ENSP00000490105.1		Q13286-1
ENSG00000261832	ENST00000637378.1 link	c.228+4647A>C		intron_variant	Intron 4 of 9	5		ENSP00000490831.1		A0A1B0GW90

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152118

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000579

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000419

AC:

AN:

1457346

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000497

AC XY:

AN XY:

724984

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33374

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44692

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26118

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00151

AC:

AN:

39686

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

85970

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52272

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4190

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1110854

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000166

AC:

AN:

60190

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.509

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152236

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74426

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41530

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000580

AC:

AN:

5172

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4812

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.558

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000756

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3

Uncertain:1

Mar 23, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.84

CADD

Benign

2.7

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.27

PhyloP100

0.19

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00014

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.0040

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

chr16-28477458-T-G

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over