chr16-50711288-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001370466.1(NOD2):c.1296C>T(p.Arg432Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.235 in 1,613,584 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 49,664 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.18 ( 3255 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.24 ( 46409 hom. )
Consequence
NOD2
NM_001370466.1 synonymous
NM_001370466.1 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0500
Genes affected
NOD2 (HGNC:5331): (nucleotide binding oligomerization domain containing 2) This gene is a member of the Nod1/Apaf-1 family and encodes a protein with two caspase recruitment (CARD) domains and six leucine-rich repeats (LRRs). The protein is primarily expressed in the peripheral blood leukocytes. It plays a role in the immune response to intracellular bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) by recognizing the muramyl dipeptide (MDP) derived from them and activating the NFKB protein. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Crohn disease and Blau syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 16-50711288-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-50711288-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 319445.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-50711288-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.05 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.266 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOD2 | NM_001370466.1 | c.1296C>T | p.Arg432Arg | synonymous_variant | 4/12 | ENST00000647318.2 | NP_001357395.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOD2 | ENST00000647318.2 | c.1296C>T | p.Arg432Arg | synonymous_variant | 4/12 | NM_001370466.1 | ENSP00000495993.1 | |||
NOD2 | ENST00000300589.6 | c.1377C>T | p.Arg459Arg | synonymous_variant | 4/12 | 1 | ENSP00000300589.2 | |||
NOD2 | ENST00000641284.2 | n.1296C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/6 | ENSP00000493088.1 | |||||
NOD2 | ENST00000646677.2 | n.1296C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/13 | ENSP00000496533.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.182 AC: 27624AN: 152088Hom.: 3253 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
27624
AN:
152088
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.190 AC: 47482AN: 250080Hom.: 5769 AF XY: 0.197 AC XY: 26661AN XY: 135424
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
47482
AN:
250080
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
26661
AN XY:
135424
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.240 AC: 351405AN: 1461378Hom.: 46409 Cov.: 47 AF XY: 0.239 AC XY: 174102AN XY: 727016
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
351405
AN:
1461378
Hom.:
Cov.:
47
AF XY:
AC XY:
174102
AN XY:
727016
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.182 AC: 27631AN: 152206Hom.: 3255 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.177 AC XY: 13150AN XY: 74416
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
27631
AN:
152206
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
13150
AN XY:
74416
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
260
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan | Nov 12, 2023 | This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 32% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 31. Only high quality variants are reported. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 29, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Regional enteritis;C5201146:Blau syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Inflammatory bowel disease 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Blau syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at