chr16-51137197-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP6BS1BS2
The NM_002968.3(SALL1):c.3890T>G(p.Leu1297Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000248 in 1,613,912 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002968.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Townes-Brocks syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, G2P, Ambry Genetics
- Townes-Brocks syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002968.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SALL1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.3890T>G | p.Leu1297Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000251020.4 | Q9NSC2-1 | ||
| SALL1 | TSL:1 | c.*327T>G | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000455582.1 | H3BQ32 | |||
| SALL1 | TSL:5 | c.3890T>G | p.Leu1297Arg | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000407914.2 | Q9NSC2-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152026Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000278 AC: 7AN: 251472 AF XY: 0.0000221 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000233 AC: 34AN: 1461886Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000234 AC XY: 17AN XY: 727246 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152026Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74250 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at