chr16-53649037-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_015272.5(RPGRIP1L):​c.2231G>A​(p.Arg744Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0379 in 1,613,796 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,789 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R744L) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.032 ( 161 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.039 ( 1628 hom. )

Consequence

RPGRIP1L
NM_015272.5 missense

Scores

1
7
10

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.43
Variant links:
Genes affected
RPGRIP1L (HGNC:29168): (RPGRIP1 like) The protein encoded by this gene can localize to the basal body-centrosome complex or to primary cilia and centrosomes in ciliated cells. The encoded protein has been found to interact with nephrocystin-4. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome type 7 (JBTS7) and Meckel syndrome type 5 (MKS5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0016984642).
BP6
Variant 16-53649037-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-53649037-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 95690.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-53649037-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr16-53649037-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.128 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RPGRIP1LNM_015272.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.2231G>A p.Arg744Gln missense_variant 16/27 ENST00000647211.2 NP_056087.2 Q68CZ1-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RPGRIP1LENST00000647211.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2231G>A p.Arg744Gln missense_variant 16/27 NM_015272.5 ENSP00000493946.1 Q68CZ1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0315
AC:
4793
AN:
152112
Hom.:
154
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0570
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0320
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0337
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.136
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0946
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00688
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0886
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0350
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0344
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0462
AC:
11606
AN:
251400
Hom.:
513
AF XY:
0.0500
AC XY:
6798
AN XY:
135866
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00861
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0243
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0380
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.163
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0928
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00767
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0347
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0478
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0386
AC:
56349
AN:
1461566
Hom.:
1628
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0407
AC XY:
29559
AN XY:
727130
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0245
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0370
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.133
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0921
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00799
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0331
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0452
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0316
AC:
4804
AN:
152230
Hom.:
161
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0324
AC XY:
2415
AN XY:
74438
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0319
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0337
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.136
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0942
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00688
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0350
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0430
Alfa
AF:
0.0385
Hom.:
414
Bravo
AF:
0.0313
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0286
AC:
106
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0337
AC:
130
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0102
AC:
45
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0327
AC:
281
ExAC
AF:
0.0463
AC:
5619
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0990
AC:
343
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0419
EpiControl
AF:
0.0445

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 31, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 10, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 10, 2021- -
Joubert syndrome 7 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Meckel syndrome, type 5 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Kidney disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenJul 01, 2019- -
Nephronophthisis 8 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.21
CADD
Pathogenic
26
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.028
.;.;T;.;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.60
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.65
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.89
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D;.;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0017
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.90
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.3
M;M;.;M;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.99
N;.;.;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.32
Sift
Benign
0.040
D;.;.;T;T;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.034
D;.;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;.;D;.;.
Vest4
0.28
MPC
0.43
ClinPred
0.019
T
GERP RS
6.1
Varity_R
0.14
gMVP
0.59

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2302677; hg19: chr16-53682949; COSMIC: COSV50909319; COSMIC: COSV50909319; API