Variant chr16-57882735-A-G details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2

The NM_001297.5(CNGB1):c.*1429T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00249 in 152,290 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0025 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )

Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

CNGB1
NM_001297.5 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.185

Variant links:

Genes affected

CNGB1 (HGNC:2151): (cyclic nucleotide gated channel subunit beta 1) In humans, the rod photoreceptor cGMP-gated cation channel helps regulate ion flow into the rod photoreceptor outer segment in response to light-induced alteration of the levels of intracellular cGMP. This channel consists of two subunits, alpha and beta, with the protein encoded by this gene representing the beta subunit. Defects in this gene are a cause of cause of retinitis pigmentosa type 45. Three transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2013]

CNGB1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
CNGB1	NM_001297.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.*1429T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	33/33	ENST00000251102.13
CNGB1	NM_001286130.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.*1429T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	33/33

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
CNGB1	ENST00000251102.13 linkuse as main transcript	c.*1429T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	33/33	1	NM_001297.5	P4	Q14028-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00250

AC:

380

AN:

152176

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00676

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00347

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000514

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00573

GnomAD4 exome

Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00249

AC:

379

AN:

152290

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00252

AC XY:

188

AN XY:

74478

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00671

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00347

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000514

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00567

Alfa

AF:

0.00215

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00327

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Retinitis pigmentosa

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.68

CADD

Benign

5.8

DANN

Benign

0.90

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over