chr16-68738340-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. BS2PM2_Supporting

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.92G>T (NM_004360.5) variant in CDH1 is a missense variant predicted to predicted to cause substitution of Gly by Val at amino acid 31 (p.Gly31Val) in exon 2. This variant was observed in more than ten individuals with no DGC, LBC or SRC tumours and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; Invitae, Ambry). This variant is absent from gnomAD 2.1.1 (PM2_Spporting). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as likely benign for DGLBCS based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen CDH1 VCEP: PM2_Supporting, BS2. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 05/06/2022) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA396451877/MONDO:0100488/007

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

4
11
4

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.71
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BS2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.92G>T p.Gly31Val missense_variant 2/16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1 P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.92G>T p.Gly31Val missense_variant 2/15 NP_001304113.1 P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-1524G>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 2/16 NP_001304114.1 P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-1728G>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 2/15 NP_001304115.1 P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.92G>T p.Gly31Val missense_variant 2/161 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769.4 P12830-1
CDH1ENST00000422392.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.92G>T p.Gly31Val missense_variant 2/151 ENSP00000414946.2 P12830-2
CDH1ENST00000566612.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.92G>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/151 ENSP00000454782.1 H3BNC6
CDH1ENST00000566510.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.92G>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/155 ENSP00000458139.1 H3BVI7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
31
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJun 30, 2023In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 428635). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CDH1-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 31 of the CDH1 protein (p.Gly31Val). -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 31, 2023The p.G31V variant (also known as c.92G>T), located in coding exon 2 of the CDH1 gene, results from a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 92. The glycine at codon 31 is replaced by valine, an amino acid with dissimilar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert PanelAug 02, 2023The c.92G>T (NM_004360.5) variant in CDH1 is a missense variant predicted to predicted to cause substitution of Gly by Val at amino acid 31 (p.Gly31Val) in exon 2. This variant was observed in more than ten individuals with no DGC, LBC or SRC tumours and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; Invitae, Ambry). This variant is absent from gnomAD 2.1.1 (PM2_Spporting). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as likely benign for DGLBCS based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen CDH1 VCEP: PM2_Supporting, BS2. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 05/06/2022) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.52
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.16
D
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.010
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.37
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.47
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.42
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.81
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.15
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.91
D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.19
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
2.9
M;.;.;.;M
PrimateAI
Benign
0.45
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.7
D;.;.;.;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.36
Sift
Benign
0.058
T;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.032
D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.72
P;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.79
MutPred
0.67
Loss of disorder (P = 0.0376);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0376);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0376);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0376);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0376);
MVP
0.88
MPC
1.0
ClinPred
0.99
D
GERP RS
4.8
Varity_R
0.85
gMVP
0.77

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1131690823; hg19: chr16-68772243; API