chr16-68801729-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. BS2PM2_Supporting

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.223T>C (p.Phe75Leu) missense variant has a frequency of 0.000003977 (1 of 251,418) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort, with a maximum non-founder allele frequency of 0.000008795 (1 of 113,700) in the Non-Finnish European population (PM2_Supporting; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in ≥10 individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as of likely benign based the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): PM2_supporting, BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA167218/MONDO:0007648/007

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 6.8e-7 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

2
11
6

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.88
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BS2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.223T>C p.Phe75Leu missense_variant 3/16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1 P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.223T>C p.Phe75Leu missense_variant 3/15 NP_001304113.1 P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-1393T>C 5_prime_UTR_variant 3/16 NP_001304114.1 P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-1597T>C 5_prime_UTR_variant 3/15 NP_001304115.1 P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.223T>C p.Phe75Leu missense_variant 3/161 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769.4 P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000398
AC:
1
AN:
251418
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
135882
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
6.84e-7
AC:
1
AN:
1461878
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
8.99e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Alfa
AF:
0.0000468
Hom.:
0

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoApr 01, 2021- -
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpAug 07, 2023In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 142040). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 31871109). This variant is present in population databases (rs587782193, gnomAD 0.0009%). This sequence change replaces phenylalanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 75 of the CDH1 protein (p.Phe75Leu). -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert PanelAug 18, 2023The c.223T>C (p.Phe75Leu) missense variant has a frequency of 0.000003977 (1 of 251,418) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort, with a maximum non-founder allele frequency of 0.000008795 (1 of 113,700) in the Non-Finnish European population (PM2_Supporting; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in at least 10 individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as of likely benign based the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): PM2_supporting, BS2. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 09, 2016This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.94
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.064
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.15
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.31
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
0.099
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.19
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.82
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.78
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.20
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.79
D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.011
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.9
M;.;.;.;M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.55
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.8
D;.;.;.;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.51
Sift
Uncertain
0.021
D;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.059
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.050
B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.46
MutPred
0.85
Loss of methylation at K76 (P = 0.0302);Loss of methylation at K76 (P = 0.0302);Loss of methylation at K76 (P = 0.0302);Loss of methylation at K76 (P = 0.0302);Loss of methylation at K76 (P = 0.0302);
MVP
0.92
MPC
0.32
ClinPred
0.94
D
GERP RS
4.3
Varity_R
0.28
gMVP
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587782193; hg19: chr16-68835632; API