chr16-68801809-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_001317185.2(CDH1):c.-1313C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR premature start codon gain change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000539 in 1,614,180 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00025 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000034 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CDH1
NM_001317185.2 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain
NM_001317185.2 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.03
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 16-68801809-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68801809-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 183867.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=8, Benign=6}. Variant chr16-68801809-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 38 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.303C>T | p.Tyr101Tyr | synonymous_variant | 3/16 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000243 AC: 37AN: 152198Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
37
AN:
152198
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000517 AC: 13AN: 251260Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000515 AC XY: 7AN XY: 135792
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
251260
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
135792
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000335 AC: 49AN: 1461866Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000344 AC XY: 25AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
49
AN:
1461866
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
727232
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000249 AC: 38AN: 152314Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000309 AC XY: 23AN XY: 74480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
38
AN:
152314
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
74480
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | May 10, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The CDH1 p.Tyr101= variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs150789339) as "With Likely benign allele" and ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx; and as likely benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Counsyl and Color). The variant was identified in control databases in 21 of 276986 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00008 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 16 of 24034 chromosomes (freq: 0.0007), Other in 1 of 6460 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 2 of 34416 chromosomes (freq: 0.000068), and European in 2 of 126494 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Tyr101= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto | Aug 01, 2022 | BP7 (PMID: 30311375) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 06, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 27, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 06, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Feb 04, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 29, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 30, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Aug 04, 2021 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C0476089:Endometrial carcinoma;C0919267:Ovarian neoplasm;C1708349:Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma;C4551988:Blepharocheilodontic syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 27, 2021 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jun 24, 2021 | - - |
CDH1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 24, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jan 24, 2020 | - - |
Malignant tumor of prostate Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at