chr16-68801809-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_001317185.2(CDH1):​c.-1313C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR premature start codon gain change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000539 in 1,614,180 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00025 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000034 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_001317185.2 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.03
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 16-68801809-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68801809-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 183867.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=8, Benign=6}. Variant chr16-68801809-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 38 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkc.303C>T p.Tyr101Tyr synonymous_variant 3/16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1 P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkc.303C>T p.Tyr101Tyr synonymous_variant 3/161 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769.4 P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000243
AC:
37
AN:
152198
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000772
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000517
AC:
13
AN:
251260
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000515
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
135792
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000881
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000335
AC:
49
AN:
1461866
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000344
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000747
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000894
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000899
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000993
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000249
AC:
38
AN:
152314
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000309
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000794
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000263
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000370

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 10, 2016- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The CDH1 p.Tyr101= variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs150789339) as "With Likely benign allele" and ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx; and as likely benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Counsyl and Color). The variant was identified in control databases in 21 of 276986 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00008 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 16 of 24034 chromosomes (freq: 0.0007), Other in 1 of 6460 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 2 of 34416 chromosomes (freq: 0.000068), and European in 2 of 126494 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Tyr101= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEuropean Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of PortoAug 01, 2022BP7 (PMID: 30311375) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 06, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 25, 2024- -
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 27, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpNov 06, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoFeb 04, 2021- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 29, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 30, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Aug 04, 2021- -
Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C0476089:Endometrial carcinoma;C0919267:Ovarian neoplasm;C1708349:Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma;C4551988:Blepharocheilodontic syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 27, 2021- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJun 24, 2021- -
CDH1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 24, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 24, 2020- -
Malignant tumor of prostate Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.85
CADD
Benign
0.58
DANN
Benign
0.28

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150789339; hg19: chr16-68835712; API