chr16-68810289-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2_Supporting
The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.780C>T(p.Pro260Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000291 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- blepharocheilodontic syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
- cleft soft palateInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- orofacial cleft 3Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- blepharocheilodontic syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.780C>T | p.Pro260Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 16 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152104Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 251466 AF XY: 0.0000221 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000280 AC: 41AN: 1461846Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000248 AC XY: 18AN XY: 727224 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152104Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74322 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Benign:2
This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
The CDH1 p.Pro260= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database, or Zhejiang Colon Cancer Databases. The variant was identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs765090311) as With Likely benign allele, ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae, GeneDx), and Clinvitae (classified as likely benign ClinVar, Invitae). The variant was identified in control databases in 7 of 246238 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Pro260= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at