chr16-68812262-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.1136C>T (p.Thr379Met) variant results in a conservative missense change in the Cadherin 3 domain of CDH1. This variant was observed in 2 of 152,226 alleles in the gnomAD population database. However, this variants has also been observed in more than 10 individuals without GC, DGC, gastric SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as Likely Benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BS2. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 05/22/2023) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA169895/MONDO:0100488/007

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000023 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense, splice_region

Scores

1
18
Splicing: ADA: 0.0005409
2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:6B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.01
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BS2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1136C>T p.Thr379Met missense_variant, splice_region_variant 8/16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1136C>T p.Thr379Met missense_variant, splice_region_variant 8/15 NP_001304113.1
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-480C>T splice_region_variant, 5_prime_UTR_variant 8/16 NP_001304114.1
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-684C>T splice_region_variant, 5_prime_UTR_variant 8/15 NP_001304115.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1136C>T p.Thr379Met missense_variant, splice_region_variant 8/161 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769 P1P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152226
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000159
AC:
4
AN:
251460
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000147
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
135904
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000226
AC:
33
AN:
1461718
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000234
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
727168
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000243
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152226
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74372
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000712
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000113
ExAC
AF:
0.0000165
AC:
2
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:4
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:4Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEuropean Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de InvestigaĆ§Ć£o e InovaĆ§Ć£o em SaĆŗde, University of PortoAug 01, 2022PM2 (PMID: 30311375) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 06, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJun 14, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJul 02, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 12, 2024- -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 14, 2023The CDH1 c.1136C>T; p.Thr379Met variant (rs587782856) is reported in the literature in individuals affected with cancer (Garcia-Pelaez 2023, Guindalini 2022). This variant is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 142968), and is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.002% (4/251,460 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. Computational analyses predict that this variant is neutral (REVEL: 0.03). Due to limited information, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain at this time. References: Garcia-Pelaez J et al. Genotype-first approach to identify associations between CDH1 germline variants and cancer phenotypes: a multicentre study by the European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Jan;24(1):91-106. PMID: 36436516. Guindalini RSC et al. Detection of germline variants in Brazilian breast cancer patients using multigene panel testing. Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 9;12(1):4190. PMID: 35264596. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 02, 2022Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30836094, 30766968, 31871109, 15235021, 22850631) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 16, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJan 05, 2024- -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert PanelAug 03, 2023The c.1136C>T (p.Thr379Met) variant results in a conservative missense change in the Cadherin 3 domain of CDH1. This variant was observed in 2 of 152,226 alleles in the gnomAD population database. However, this variants has also been observed in more than 10 individuals without GC, DGC, gastric SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as Likely Benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BS2. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 05/22/2023) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.070
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.34
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
6.6
DANN
Benign
0.84
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.73
D;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.3
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.4
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.12
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.52
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.020
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.14
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L;.;.;.;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.4
N;.;.;.;D
REVEL
Benign
0.030
Sift
Benign
0.093
T;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.16
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.031
B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.14
MutPred
0.27
Loss of glycosylation at T379 (P = 0.0586);Loss of glycosylation at T379 (P = 0.0586);Loss of glycosylation at T379 (P = 0.0586);Loss of glycosylation at T379 (P = 0.0586);Loss of glycosylation at T379 (P = 0.0586);
MVP
0.61
MPC
0.27
ClinPred
0.045
T
GERP RS
-4.7
Varity_R
0.047
gMVP
0.50

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00054
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0040
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587782856; hg19: chr16-68846165; COSMIC: COSV55731223; COSMIC: COSV55731223; API