chr16-68821993-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.1712-8T>C variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.1712-8T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.1529-8T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | NP_001304113.1 | ||||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.164-8T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | NP_001304114.1 | ||||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-254-8T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | NP_001304115.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.1712-8T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_004360.5 | ENSP00000261769 | P1 | |||
ENST00000563916.1 | n.263+1271A>G | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | May 16, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 22, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto | Aug 01, 2022 | PM2 (PMID: 30311375) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 03, 2023 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Nov 17, 2020 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The CDH1 c.1712-8T>C variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the dbSNP, Cosmic, MutDB, Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database, or Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in ClinVar and Clinvitae (as likely benign by Invitae). The variant was not identified in the following control databases: the 1000 Genomes Project, the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project, the Exome Aggregation Consortium (August 8th 2016), or the Genome Aggregation Database (Feb 27, 2017). The c.1712-8T>C variant is located in the 3' splice region but does not affect the invariant -1 and -2 positions. However, positions -3 and -5 to -12 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. However, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at