chr16-84154770-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_178452.6(DNAAF1):āc.546C>Gā(p.Asn182Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00196 in 1,614,120 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_178452.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAAF1 | NM_178452.6 | c.546C>G | p.Asn182Lys | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 12 | ENST00000378553.10 | NP_848547.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAAF1 | ENST00000378553.10 | c.546C>G | p.Asn182Lys | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 12 | 1 | NM_178452.6 | ENSP00000367815.5 | ||
DNAAF1 | ENST00000567918.5 | n.546C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 4 of 7 | 1 | ENSP00000455154.1 | ||||
DNAAF1 | ENST00000563093.5 | n.546C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 4 of 11 | 2 | ENSP00000457373.1 | ||||
DNAAF1 | ENST00000570298.5 | n.700C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 4 of 11 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00149 AC: 226AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00137 AC: 345AN: 251476Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00130 AC XY: 177AN XY: 135910
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00201 AC: 2935AN: 1461822Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00191 AC XY: 1390AN XY: 727218
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00148 AC: 225AN: 152298Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00157 AC XY: 117AN XY: 74482
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:4Benign:1
DNAAF1: BS2 -
- -
- -
- -
BP4 -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Uncertain:1Benign:2
- -
- -
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 13 Uncertain:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
The DNAAF1 c.546C>G; p.Asn182Lys variant (rs144018942), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature but is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 166997). This variant is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.1% (370/282,876 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database (v2.1.1). Computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.193). While the high population frequency suggests that this is likely a benign variant, given the lack of clinical and functional data, the significance of this variant is uncertain at this time. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at