chr16-84170327-C-G

Position:

chr16-84170327-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_178452.6(DNAAF1):c.1499C>G(p.Pro500Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000143 in 1,611,858 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00064 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000091 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

DNAAF1
NM_178452.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.37

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAAF1 (HGNC:30539): (dynein axonemal assembly factor 1) The protein encoded by this gene is cilium-specific and is required for the stability of the ciliary architecture. It is involved in the regulation of microtubule-based cilia and actin-based brush border microvilli. Mutations in this gene are associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia-13. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

DNAAF1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010858774).

BP6

Variant 16-84170327-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-84170327-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 228601.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000637 (97/152298) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00231 (96/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00194. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 46 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
DNAAF1	NM_178452.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.1499C>G	p.Pro500Arg	missense_variant	8/12	ENST00000378553.10

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
DNAAF1	ENST00000378553.10 linkuse as main transcript	c.1499C>G	p.Pro500Arg	missense_variant	8/12	1	NM_178452.6	P1	Q8NEP3-1
DNAAF1	ENST00000563818.5 linkuse as main transcript	n.1176C>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	4/8	2
DNAAF1	ENST00000570298.5 linkuse as main transcript	n.1653C>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	8/11	2
DNAAF1	ENST00000563093.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.*54C>G		3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant	9/11	2			Q8NEP3-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000637

AC:

AN:

152180

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00232

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000181

AC:

AN:

248722

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000962

AC XY:

AN XY:

135088

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00291

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000911

AC:

133

AN:

1459560

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000702

AC XY:

AN XY:

726174

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00359

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000227

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000637

AC:

AN:

152298

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000618

AC XY:

AN XY:

74466

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00231

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000113

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000805

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00137

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000223

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Dec 21, 2023	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	UNC Molecular Genetics Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill	Jan 11, 2018	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Dec 07, 2019	This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Feb 15, 2016

Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Pro500Arg var iant in DNAAF1 has not been previously reported in individuals with pulmonary di sease, but has been identified in 0.25% (24/9432) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs1388 38276). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that th e p.Pro500Arg variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, while the clinical si gnificance of the p.Pro500Arg variant is uncertain, its frequency suggests that it is more likely to be benign. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Dec 27, 2023

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.071

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.58

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.61

CADD

Benign

7.1

DANN

Benign

0.91

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.0065

Eigen

Benign

-0.91

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.1

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.046

LIST_S2

Benign

0.37

M_CAP

Benign

0.0028

MetaRNN

Benign

0.011

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.0

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

PrimateAI

Benign

0.34

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.25

REVEL

Benign

0.046

Sift

Benign

0.40

Sift4G

Benign

0.64

Polyphen

0.38

Vest4

0.25

MVP

0.17

MPC

0.025

ClinPred

0.022

GERP RS

-0.83

Varity_R

0.033

gMVP

0.058

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over