chr16-84172263-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_178452.6(DNAAF1):āc.1532C>Gā(p.Pro511Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000186 in 1,613,736 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P511L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_178452.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAAF1 | NM_178452.6 | c.1532C>G | p.Pro511Arg | missense_variant | 9/12 | ENST00000378553.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAAF1 | ENST00000378553.10 | c.1532C>G | p.Pro511Arg | missense_variant | 9/12 | 1 | NM_178452.6 | P1 | |
DNAAF1 | ENST00000563818.5 | n.1209C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/8 | 2 | ||||
DNAAF1 | ENST00000570298.5 | n.1686C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 9/11 | 2 | ||||
DNAAF1 | ENST00000563093.5 | c.*87C>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 10/11 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152158Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461578Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727068
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152158Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74322
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at