chr17-10392944-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_002472.3(MYH8):c.5350C>G(p.Arg1784Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00729 in 1,614,100 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 62 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1784W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002472.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002472.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYH8 | NM_002472.3 | MANE Select | c.5350C>G | p.Arg1784Gly | missense | Exon 37 of 40 | NP_002463.2 | ||
| MYHAS | NR_125367.1 | n.76+9737G>C | intron | N/A |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYH8 | ENST00000403437.2 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.5350C>G | p.Arg1784Gly | missense | Exon 37 of 40 | ENSP00000384330.2 | ||
| MYHAS | ENST00000399342.6 | TSL:3 | n.76+9737G>C | intron | N/A | ||||
| MYHAS | ENST00000581304.2 | TSL:3 | n.52+9737G>C | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00467 AC: 711AN: 152090Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00530 AC: 1334AN: 251490 AF XY: 0.00547 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00756 AC: 11058AN: 1461892Hom.: 59 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00740 AC XY: 5384AN XY: 727246 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00466 AC: 709AN: 152208Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00462 AC XY: 344AN XY: 74418 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29565416)
MYH8: PP3, BS2
not specified Benign:2
Hecht syndrome Benign:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Based on data from the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP), the G-allele has an overall frequency of approximately 0.42% (45/10754) total alleles studied. The G-allele was observed in 0.58% (41/7016) European American alleles and in 0.11% (4/3738) African American alleles studied and was not observed in the homozygous state out of 5377 individuals studied. Based on data from the 1000 Genomes Project, the G-allele has an overall frequency of approximately 0.32% (7/2188) and the highest frequency was in 1.82% (2/110) 1.82% Puerto Rican chromosomes studied.The R1784 amino acid is highly conserved among available vertebrate species.This alteration is predicted to be probably damaging with a score of 0.961 (sensitivity: 0.62; specificity: 0.92)This alteration is predicted to be deleterious with a score of 0.000 (conservation: 3.05)
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at