chr17-18118854-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.54G>A(p.Lys18Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00225 in 1,612,666 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016239.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00141 AC: 215AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00163 AC: 397AN: 244140Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00167 AC XY: 222AN XY: 133032
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00234 AC: 3414AN: 1460344Hom.: 5 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00230 AC XY: 1672AN XY: 726366
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00141 AC: 215AN: 152322Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00128 AC XY: 95AN XY: 74486
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
- -
Nucleotide substitution has no predicted effect on splicing and is not conserved across species; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24498627) -
MYO15A: BP4, BS1 -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:2
- -
p.Lys18Lys in exon 02 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located with in the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.2% (134/56718) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.bro adinstitute.org; dbSNP rs144909486). -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Uncertain:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at