chr17-31182623-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.846G>A(p.Gln282=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00366 in 1,613,864 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 90 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0038 ( 89 hom. )
Consequence
NF1
NM_001042492.3 synonymous
NM_001042492.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.844
Genes affected
NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).
BP6
Variant 17-31182623-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31182623-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184123.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-31182623-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-31182623-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.844 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00236 (359/152298) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0286 (138/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0247. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 209 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 359 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NF1 | NM_001042492.3 | c.846G>A | p.Gln282= | synonymous_variant | 8/58 | ENST00000358273.9 | |
NF1 | NM_000267.3 | c.846G>A | p.Gln282= | synonymous_variant | 8/57 | ||
NF1 | NM_001128147.3 | c.846G>A | p.Gln282= | synonymous_variant | 8/15 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NF1 | ENST00000358273.9 | c.846G>A | p.Gln282= | synonymous_variant | 8/58 | 1 | NM_001042492.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00237 AC: 360AN: 152182Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
360
AN:
152182
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00548 AC: 1374AN: 250938Hom.: 29 AF XY: 0.00700 AC XY: 949AN XY: 135620
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1374
AN:
250938
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
949
AN XY:
135620
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00379 AC: 5543AN: 1461566Hom.: 89 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00482 AC XY: 3507AN XY: 727068
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5543
AN:
1461566
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3507
AN XY:
727068
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00236 AC: 359AN: 152298Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00281 AC XY: 209AN XY: 74478
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
359
AN:
152298
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
209
AN XY:
74478
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
41
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:22
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Mar 31, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 21, 2017 | Variant summary: The NF1 c.846G>A (p.Gln282Gln) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant does not affect any ESE site. This variant was found in 706/116664 control chromosomes (23 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0060516, which is approximately 29 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic NF1 variant (0.0002084), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as likely benign/benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 01, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 12552569, 26979654, 15146469, 15060124, 15994866, 15863657, 16944272, 27182040, 17726231, 27535533, 28536309) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Oct 08, 2015 | p.Gln282Gln in exon 8 of NF1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 3.43% (542/15784) of South Asian chro mosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.or g; dbSNP rs138840528). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Oct 26, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Mar 15, 2022 | - - |
Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Myopathy, centronuclear, 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard | - | The heterozygous c.846G>A (p.Gln282=) variant in NF1 has been identified in an individual with neurofibromatosis (PMID: 15060124), and has been identified in >3% of South Asian chromosomes and 23 homozygotes by ExAC (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign for autosomal dominant neurofibromatosis. - |
Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 08, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 16, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at