chr17-31200565-A-G

Variant names:

• chr17-31200565-A-G
• rs199832006
• NM_001042492.3:c.1032A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_Strong BP6 BP7 BS2_Supporting

The NM_001042492.3(NF1):​c.1032A>G​(p.Leu344Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00016 in 1,614,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00017 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00016 (3 hom.)
• Consequence: NF1 NM_001042492.3 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4 B:8
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -1.27

Genes affected

NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
• BP6: Variant 17-31200565-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31200565-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 184189.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=4, Benign=4, Likely_benign=4}. Variant chr17-31200565-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.27 with no splicing effect.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 26 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NF1	NM_001042492.3	c.1032A>G	p.Leu344Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 58	ENST00000358273.9	NP_001035957.1
NF1	NM_000267.3	c.1032A>G	p.Leu344Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 57		NP_000258.1
NF1	NM_001128147.3	c.1032A>G	p.Leu344Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 15		NP_001121619.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NF1	ENST00000358273.9	c.1032A>G	p.Leu344Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 58	1	NM_001042492.3	ENSP00000351015.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000171 AC: 26 AN: 152234 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00634

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000588

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000338 AC: 85 AN: 251450 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000287 AC XY: 39 AN XY: 135902

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00724

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000791

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000163

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000159 AC: 233 AN: 1461820 Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000149 AC XY: 108 AN XY: 727220

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000134

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00662

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000270

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000397

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000171 AC: 26 AN: 152234 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000175 AC XY: 13 AN XY: 74366

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00634

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.000788 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000181

EpiCase AF: 0.0000545

EpiControl AF: 0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4 Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3

Oct 10, 2023

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 08, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Apr 28, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified Benign:2

May 24, 2019

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 26, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2

Oct 19, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 11, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.84
CADD	Benign	1.7
DANN	Benign	0.45
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.7

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199832006; hg19: chr17-29527583; COSMIC: COSV62199233;