chr17-31229165-G-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2_Supporting

The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.2550G>T(p.Val850Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000143 in 1,611,800 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V850V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000015 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NF1
NM_001042492.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.342

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

NF1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

neurofibromatosis type 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
Moyamoya disease
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
familial ovarian cancer
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

NF1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).

BP6

Variant 17-31229165-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31229165-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 230110.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.342 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 22 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NF1	NM_001042492.3 link	c.2550G>T	p.Val850Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 21 of 58	ENST00000358273.9	NP_001035957.1	P21359-1
NF1	NM_000267.4 link	c.2550G>T	p.Val850Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 21 of 57		NP_000258.1	P21359-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NF1	ENST00000358273.9 link	c.2550G>T	p.Val850Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 21 of 58	1	NM_001042492.3	ENSP00000351015.4		P21359-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152192

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000120

AC:

AN:

250614

AF XY:

0.0000221

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000580

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000884

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000151

AC:

AN:

1459608

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000193

AC XY:

AN XY:

726108

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33400

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000448

AC:

AN:

44690

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39690

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86164

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53414

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4138

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000153

AC:

AN:

1111780

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000332

AC:

AN:

60202

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.500

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152192

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74356

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41448

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15280

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3466

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5200

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68034

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2094

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0.000000), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.375

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neurofibromatosis, type 1

Benign:2

Jan 14, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 15, 2022

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

NF1-related disorder

Benign:1

Nov 10, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 19, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.52

CADD

Benign

1.6

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.67

PhyloP100

-0.34

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over