chr17-31326033-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2_Supporting

The NM_001042492.3(NF1):​c.5049C>T​(p.Asn1683Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000173 in 1,614,066 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00018 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NF1
NM_001042492.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.39

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
NF1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • neurofibromatosis type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
  • neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
  • Moyamoya disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).
BP6
Variant 17-31326033-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31326033-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 184710.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.39 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 18 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NF1NM_001042492.3 linkc.5049C>T p.Asn1683Asn synonymous_variant Exon 37 of 58 ENST00000358273.9 NP_001035957.1 P21359-1
NF1NM_000267.4 linkc.4986C>T p.Asn1662Asn synonymous_variant Exon 36 of 57 NP_000258.1 P21359-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NF1ENST00000358273.9 linkc.5049C>T p.Asn1683Asn synonymous_variant Exon 37 of 58 1 NM_001042492.3 ENSP00000351015.4 P21359-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000118
AC:
18
AN:
152190
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000127
AC:
32
AN:
251392
AF XY:
0.000125
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000179
AC:
261
AN:
1461876
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000176
AC XY:
128
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000299
AC:
1
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00222
AC:
58
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000170
AC:
189
AN:
1111998
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000215
AC:
13
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.493
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18
35
53
70
88
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000118
AC:
18
AN:
152190
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000108
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74354
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41436
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000654
AC:
1
AN:
15282
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5196
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000147
AC:
10
AN:
68036
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2092
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
3
4
6
7
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000313
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000144
EpiCase
AF:
0.000382
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Feb 01, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Oct 26, 2020
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Jan 09, 2019
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 28, 2018
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: NF1 c.4986C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant was observed with an allele frequency of 0.0001191 in 277132 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The observed variant frequency within Ashkenazi Jewish control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 8-folds higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in NF1 causing Neurofibromatosis Type 1 phenotype (0.00021), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in population(s) of Ashkenazi Jewish origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.4986C>T in individuals affected with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Multiple ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as "benign." Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Jan 15, 2019
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

NF1: BP4, BP7 -

Mar 30, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Feb 20, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Jul 07, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Nov 17, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Jun 18, 2024
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Uncertain:1
Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Uncertain:1
Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis Uncertain:1
Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.47
CADD
Benign
9.5
DANN
Benign
0.80
PhyloP100
1.4
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140994965; hg19: chr17-29653051; API