chr17-35101029-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2

The NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.911G>A(p.Gly304Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000254 in 1,613,610 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G304C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000025 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RAD51D
NM_002878.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.96

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RAD51D (HGNC:9823): (RAD51 paralog D) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RAD51 protein family. RAD51 family members are highly similar to bacterial RecA and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51, which are known to be involved in the homologous recombination and repair of DNA. This protein forms a complex with several other members of the RAD51 family, including RAD51L1, RAD51L2, and XRCC2. The protein complex formed with this protein has been shown to catalyze homologous pairing between single- and double-stranded DNA, and is thought to play a role in the early stage of recombinational repair of DNA. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Read-through transcription also exists between this gene and the downstream ring finger and FYVE-like domain containing 1 (RFFL) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

RAD51D Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
hereditary breast carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

RAD51D links:

ENSG00000267618 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000267618 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 37 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RAD51D	NM_002878.4 link	c.911G>A	p.Gly304Asp	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 10	ENST00000345365.11	NP_002869.3	O75771-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RAD51D	ENST00000345365.11 link	c.911G>A	p.Gly304Asp	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 10	1	NM_002878.4	ENSP00000338790.6		O75771-1
ENSG00000267618	ENST00000593039.5 link	c.426+172G>A		intron_variant	Intron 5 of 6	2		ENSP00000466834.1		K7EN88

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152190

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000199

AC:

AN:

251482

AF XY:

0.0000368

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000253

AC:

AN:

1461420

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000344

AC XY:

AN XY:

727052

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86244

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000324

AC:

AN:

1111590

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000166

AC:

AN:

60374

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.460

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152190

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74348

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41446

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15280

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5202

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000588

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.463

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000478

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000113

ExAC

AF:

0.0000412

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4

Uncertain:3

Mar 23, 2023

St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The RAD51D c.911G>A (p.Gly304Asp) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.0062% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. This variant was identified 1 of 911 individuals with personal and family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer and in 0 of 1060 population controls (PMID: 21822267). It is absent in a database of women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (FLOSSIES database, https://whi.color.com/). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with Fanconi anemia. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -

Nov 07, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 304 of the RAD51D protein (p.Gly304Asp). This variant is present in population databases (rs200615280, gnomAD 0.006%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RAD51D-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 141707). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt RAD51D protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Feb 06, 2024

Baylor Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:2

Mar 14, 2024

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer, as well as unaffected control groups, and a father and son both with Hodgkin lymphoma from a single family (PMID: 21822267, 35977101, 33471991); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 35977101, 21822267, 33471991, 21111057, 14704354, 19327148) -

Nov 20, 2017

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:2

Nov 26, 2024

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.G304D variant (also known as c.911G>A), located in coding exon 10 of the RAD51D gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 911. The glycine at codon 304 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with similar properties. In one study, this alteration was detected in 1/911 breast-ovarian cancer families but not in 1060 population controls (Loveday C et al. Nat. Genet. 2011;43:879-82). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Jun 04, 2024

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This missense variant replaces glycine with aspartic acid at codon 304 of the RAD51D protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 33471991), an individual that met criteria for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (PMID: 21822267), and a family affected with Hodgkin lymphoma (PMID: 35977101). This variant has also been identified in 8/282882 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Apr 07, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: RAD51D c.911G>A (p.Gly304Asp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2e-05 in 253602 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.911G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast/Ovarian Cancer without strong evidence for causality (e.g. Loveday_2011, Dorling_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Five ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: all five classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.21

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.086

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.23

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.87

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.27

T;T;.;.;.

Eigen

Benign

0.17

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.22

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.90

LIST_S2

Benign

0.82

.;T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.026

MetaRNN

Uncertain

0.61

D;D;D;D;D

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.63

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.9

L;L;.;.;.

PhyloP100

3.0

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.6

D;.;.;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.19

Sift

Benign

0.30

T;.;.;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.23

T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.19

B;B;P;.;.

Vest4

0.72

MutPred

0.44

Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0711);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0711);.;.;.;

MVP

0.89

MPC

0.41

ClinPred

0.98

GERP RS

5.2

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.17

gMVP

0.57

Mutation Taster

=85/15

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.10

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over