chr17-35101280-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PP3_ModerateBS2_Supporting

The NM_002878.4(RAD51D):​c.824G>A​(p.Arg275Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000434 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R275W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000034 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RAD51D
NM_002878.4 missense

Scores

8
6
3

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.74

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAD51D (HGNC:9823): (RAD51 paralog D) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RAD51 protein family. RAD51 family members are highly similar to bacterial RecA and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51, which are known to be involved in the homologous recombination and repair of DNA. This protein forms a complex with several other members of the RAD51 family, including RAD51L1, RAD51L2, and XRCC2. The protein complex formed with this protein has been shown to catalyze homologous pairing between single- and double-stranded DNA, and is thought to play a role in the early stage of recombinational repair of DNA. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Read-through transcription also exists between this gene and the downstream ring finger and FYVE-like domain containing 1 (RFFL) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
RAD51D Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.

PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.844
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002878.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
RAD51D
NM_002878.4
MANE Select
c.824G>Ap.Arg275Gln
missense
Exon 9 of 10NP_002869.3
RAD51D
NM_001142571.2
c.884G>Ap.Arg295Gln
missense
Exon 9 of 10NP_001136043.1
RAD51D
NM_133629.3
c.488G>Ap.Arg163Gln
missense
Exon 6 of 7NP_598332.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
RAD51D
ENST00000345365.11
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.824G>Ap.Arg275Gln
missense
Exon 9 of 10ENSP00000338790.6
RAD51D
ENST00000586186.3
TSL:1
c.689G>Ap.Arg230Gln
missense
Exon 8 of 9ENSP00000468273.3
ENSG00000267618
ENST00000593039.5
TSL:2
c.347G>Ap.Arg116Gln
missense
Exon 5 of 7ENSP00000466834.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152160
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00000398
AC:
1
AN:
251444
AF XY:
0.00
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000879
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000342
AC:
5
AN:
1461886
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00000413
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53412
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000450
AC:
5
AN:
1112012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152160
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000135
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74336
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000241
AC:
1
AN:
41416
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15276
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5200
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68024
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2094
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0.00000000770867), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.400
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
0
1
1
2
2
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Alfa
AF:
0.00
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000189
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4 Uncertain:3
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 275 of the RAD51D protein (p.Arg275Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs368914740, gnomAD 0.0009%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer and/or prostate cancer (PMID: 32658311, 32832836). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 185774). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt RAD51D protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

Feb 06, 2024
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 04, 2021
Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Uncertain:2
Jul 03, 2024
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The RAD51D c.824G>A (p.Arg275Gln) variant has been reported in the published literature in an individual with breast cancer (PMID: 32658311 (2011)). This variant has also been identified in a cohort of individuals with prostate cancer and reportedly healthy individuals (PMID: 32832836 (2020)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000004 (1/251444 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is benign or damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant.

Sep 24, 2024
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Identified in an individual undergoing multi-gene hereditary cancer panel testing, who also carried a pathogenic variant in CHEK2 (PMID: 35534704); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21111057, 14704354, 19327148, 35534704)

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Dec 27, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.R275Q variant (also known as c.824G>A), located in coding exon 9 of the RAD51D gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 824. The arginine at codon 275 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.

Jan 24, 2023
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This missense variant replaces arginine with glutamine at codon 275 of the RAD51D protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with RAD51D-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/251444 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1
Jul 29, 2025
Institute of Immunology and Genetics Kaiserslautern
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ACMG Criteria: PM2_P, PP3; Variant was found in heterozygous state in Proband.

RAD51D-related disorder Uncertain:1
Aug 05, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The RAD51D c.824G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg275Gln. This variant has been reported in a Turkish individual with breast cancer and in a male with prostate cancer of African ancestry (Table S6. Akcay et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32658311; Table S2. Matejcic et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32832836). This variant is reported in 0.00088% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD and is classified as a variant of uncertain significance in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/185774/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.30
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.38
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.31
CADD
Pathogenic
33
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.41
T
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.87
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.78
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.86
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.15
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.84
D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.33
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.3
M
PhyloP100
5.7
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.3
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.68
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D
Sift4G
Benign
0.17
T
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.87
MVP
0.91
MPC
0.41
ClinPred
0.99
D
GERP RS
4.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.84
gMVP
0.84
Mutation Taster
=75/25
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs368914740; hg19: chr17-33428299; COSMIC: COSV60006675; API