chr17-35107376-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_Strong
The NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.335G>A(p.Gly112Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000142 in 1,403,930 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G112A) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002878.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD51D | NM_002878.4 | c.335G>A | p.Gly112Asp | missense_variant | 4/10 | ENST00000345365.11 | |
RAD51L3-RFFL | NR_037714.1 | n.233-895G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD51D | ENST00000345365.11 | c.335G>A | p.Gly112Asp | missense_variant | 4/10 | 1 | NM_002878.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000142 AC: 2AN: 1403930Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 701156
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jan 19, 2023 | The variant has not been reported in the published literature. It also has not been reported in large, multi-ethnic general populations (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 19, 2022 | The p.G112D variant (also known as c.335G>A), located in coding exon 4 of the RAD51D gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 335. The glycine at codon 112 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Apr 06, 2021 | In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with RAD51D-related disease. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 142955). This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces glycine with aspartic acid at codon 112 of the RAD51D protein (p.Gly112Asp). The glycine residue is highly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between glycine and aspartic acid. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at