chr17-3659990-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_004937.3(CTNS):c.970+15G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0199 in 1,596,700 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 468 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.032 ( 135 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.019 ( 333 hom. )
Consequence
CTNS
NM_004937.3 intron
NM_004937.3 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.27
Genes affected
CTNS (HGNC:2518): (cystinosin, lysosomal cystine transporter) This gene encodes a seven-transmembrane domain protein that functions to transport cystine out of lysosomes. Its activity is driven by the H+ electrochemical gradient of the lysosomal membrane. Mutations in this gene cause cystinosis, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 17-3659990-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-3659990-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 257158.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-3659990-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0684 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTNS | NM_004937.3 | c.970+15G>A | intron_variant | ENST00000046640.9 | NP_004928.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTNS | ENST00000046640.9 | c.970+15G>A | intron_variant | 1 | NM_004937.3 | ENSP00000046640 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0319 AC: 4852AN: 152198Hom.: 134 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
4852
AN:
152198
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0201 AC: 5034AN: 250196Hom.: 94 AF XY: 0.0195 AC XY: 2643AN XY: 135520
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
5034
AN:
250196
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2643
AN XY:
135520
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0186 AC: 26850AN: 1444384Hom.: 333 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0184 AC XY: 13235AN XY: 719412
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
26850
AN:
1444384
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
13235
AN XY:
719412
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0319 AC: 4857AN: 152316Hom.: 135 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0317 AC XY: 2360AN XY: 74480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
4857
AN:
152316
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
2360
AN XY:
74480
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
62
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 31, 2018 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Feb 03, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 05, 2017 | Variant summary: The CTNS c.970+15G>A variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide at a position not widely known to affect gene splicing. Mutation taster predicts a benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 2496/120078 control chromosomes (45 homozygotes) from ExAC at a frequency of 0.0207865, which is approximately 8 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CTNS variant (0.0025), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. It is more common in African subpopulation with an allele frequency of 6.5% (674/10238 chromosomes). This variant was found in a cystinosis patient who carried c.140+1G>T in homozygous state, further supporting benign outcome of the variant of interest. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases have classified this variant as likely benign/benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Ocular cystinosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Nephropathic cystinosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Juvenile nephropathic cystinosis;C0950123:Inborn genetic diseases;C2931013:Ocular cystinosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at