chr17-39710176-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 3P and 1B. PM2PP2BS1_Supporting

The NM_004448.4(ERBB2):​c.734C>T​(p.Thr245Met) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000109 in 1,612,696 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ERBB2
NM_004448.4 missense

Scores

5
10
4

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:2O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.82
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERBB2 (HGNC:3430): (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2) This gene encodes a member of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor family of receptor tyrosine kinases. This protein has no ligand binding domain of its own and therefore cannot bind growth factors. However, it does bind tightly to other ligand-bound EGF receptor family members to form a heterodimer, stabilizing ligand binding and enhancing kinase-mediated activation of downstream signalling pathways, such as those involving mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase. Allelic variations at amino acid positions 654 and 655 of isoform a (positions 624 and 625 of isoform b) have been reported, with the most common allele, Ile654/Ile655, shown here. Amplification and/or overexpression of this gene has been reported in numerous cancers, including breast and ovarian tumors. Alternative splicing results in several additional transcript variants, some encoding different isoforms and others that have not been fully characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), ERBB2. . Gene score misZ 3.2497 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 4.234 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with visceral neuropathy, familial, 2, autosomal recessive, lung cancer, Hirschsprung disease, glioma susceptibility 1.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000116 (170/1460494) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000139 (154/1111706). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00012. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 85 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
ERBB2NM_004448.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.734C>T p.Thr245Met missense_variant 6/27 ENST00000269571.10 NP_004439.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ERBB2ENST00000269571.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.734C>T p.Thr245Met missense_variant 6/271 NM_004448.4 ENSP00000269571 P1P04626-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152202
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000519
AC:
13
AN:
250278
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000517
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
135426
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000616
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000579
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000617
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000116
AC:
170
AN:
1460494
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000117
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
726582
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000671
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000928
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000191
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000497
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152202
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74366
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000772
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000529
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0000494
AC:
6
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpOct 07, 2022In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt ERBB2 protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 134091). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ERBB2-related conditions. This variant is present in population databases (rs376183465, gnomAD 0.007%). This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 245 of the ERBB2 protein (p.Thr245Met). -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.0085
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.070
CADD
Pathogenic
26
DANN
Benign
0.93
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.86
.;.;.;.;.;D
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.75
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.67
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
.;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.29
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.59
D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.17
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.1
.;.;.;.;.;M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.78
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.9
.;.;D;D;.;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.51
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
.;.;D;D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0040
D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;D;.;D;.;D
Vest4
0.59
MVP
0.84
MPC
1.0
ClinPred
0.74
D
GERP RS
4.7
Varity_R
0.46
gMVP
0.79

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs376183465; hg19: chr17-37866429; API