chr17-39710176-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 3P and 1B. PM2PP2BS1_Supporting
The NM_004448.4(ERBB2):c.734C>T(p.Thr245Met) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000109 in 1,612,696 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
ERBB2
NM_004448.4 missense
NM_004448.4 missense
Scores
5
10
4
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.82
Genes affected
ERBB2 (HGNC:3430): (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2) This gene encodes a member of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor family of receptor tyrosine kinases. This protein has no ligand binding domain of its own and therefore cannot bind growth factors. However, it does bind tightly to other ligand-bound EGF receptor family members to form a heterodimer, stabilizing ligand binding and enhancing kinase-mediated activation of downstream signalling pathways, such as those involving mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase. Allelic variations at amino acid positions 654 and 655 of isoform a (positions 624 and 625 of isoform b) have been reported, with the most common allele, Ile654/Ile655, shown here. Amplification and/or overexpression of this gene has been reported in numerous cancers, including breast and ovarian tumors. Alternative splicing results in several additional transcript variants, some encoding different isoforms and others that have not been fully characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), ERBB2. . Gene score misZ 3.2497 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 4.234 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with visceral neuropathy, familial, 2, autosomal recessive, lung cancer, Hirschsprung disease, glioma susceptibility 1.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000116 (170/1460494) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000139 (154/1111706). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00012. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 85 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERBB2 | NM_004448.4 | c.734C>T | p.Thr245Met | missense_variant | 6/27 | ENST00000269571.10 | NP_004439.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERBB2 | ENST00000269571.10 | c.734C>T | p.Thr245Met | missense_variant | 6/27 | 1 | NM_004448.4 | ENSP00000269571 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
152202
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000519 AC: 13AN: 250278Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000517 AC XY: 7AN XY: 135426
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
250278
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
135426
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000116 AC: 170AN: 1460494Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000117 AC XY: 85AN XY: 726582
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
170
AN:
1460494
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
726582
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74366
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
152202
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74366
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
AC:
6
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 07, 2022 | In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt ERBB2 protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 134091). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ERBB2-related conditions. This variant is present in population databases (rs376183465, gnomAD 0.007%). This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 245 of the ERBB2 protein (p.Thr245Met). - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
.;.;.;.;.;D
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
.;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
.;.;.;.;.;M
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
.;.;D;D;.;D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
.;.;D;D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;D;.;D;.;D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
1.0
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at