chr17-43047712-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PP3PP5
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.5407-9G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000657 in 152,260 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- Fanconi anemia, complementation group SInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_007294.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | MANE Select | c.5407-9G>A | intron | N/A | NP_009225.1 | |||
| BRCA1 | NM_001407581.1 | c.5473-9G>A | intron | N/A | NP_001394510.1 | ||||
| BRCA1 | NM_001407582.1 | c.5473-9G>A | intron | N/A | NP_001394511.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.5407-9G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000350283.3 | |||
| BRCA1 | ENST00000471181.7 | TSL:1 | c.5470-9G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000418960.2 | |||
| BRCA1 | ENST00000470026.6 | TSL:1 | c.5407-9G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000419274.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152142Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251444 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152260Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74446 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Pathogenic:1
Each variant was annotated with functional scores from MAVE data which was translated into functional evidence codes. All other evidence codes and combining criteria were adhered to as closely as possible based on the ClinGen VCEP (Variant Curation Expert Panel) gene-specific recommendations. See Supplemental Figure 34 of final paper (Supp Fig. 28 in preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690) for a table to see which lines of evidence we did not have data for. The ClinGen VCEPs are highly regarded as the gold-standard for gene-specific variant curation and are developed after extensive evaluation of the evidence by clinical and scientific experts for the particular gene to classify genomic variants on a spectrum from pathogenic to benign using the 2015 ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines as a backbone (PMID: 25741868). Reclassification of these VUS variants from gnomAD or All of Us focused only on variants originally prescribed as VUS in ClinVar. To ensure reproducibility, transparency, and increased throughput, all the procedures for annotating variants and assigning evidence codes were codified using Python. All code has been made freely available and is linked in the Code Availability section and all reclassified variants with evidence codes used can be found in Tables S18-19 (preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690). For the MAVE data, the clinical curation and clinical strength assignment as per the ClinGen recommendations in Brnich et al. (2020) (PMID: 31892348) for or against pathogenicity or benignity of each of these MAVE datasets utilized in this study were previously published in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697).In brief, for BRCA1 variants, if a variant was categorized as FUNC (functional), it was assigned BS3 evidence and no PS3 evidence, whereas if it was categorized as LOF (loss of function), the variant was assigned PS3 evidence and no BS3 evidence. Variants categorized as INT (intermediate) were left unannotated. For the BRCA1 combining criteria, greater than or equal to 1 criteria of strong benign evidence was enough to reclassify the VUS as Likely Benign. This variant GRCh37:17:41199729:C>T was assigned evidence codes ['PS3', 'PP3', 'PM2_Supporting'] and an overall classification of Likely Pathogenic
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:1
The c.5407-9G>A intronic pathogenic mutation results from a G to A substitution 9 nucleotides upstream from coding exon 21 in the BRCA1 gene. This nucleotide position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. One functional study found that this nucleotide substitution is non-functional in a high throughput genome editing haploid cell survival assay (Findlay GM et al. Nature, 2018 Oct;562:217-222).In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration may weaken the native splice acceptor site and will result in the creation or strengthening of a novel splice acceptor site. RNA studies have demonstrated that this alteration results in abnormal splicing in the set of samples tested (Ambry internal data). Based on the supporting evidence, this variant is interpreted as a disease-causing mutation.
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Pathogenic:1
This sequence change falls in intron 21 of the BRCA1 gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the BRCA1 protein. RNA analysis indicates that this variant induces altered splicing and likely disrupts the C-terminus of the protein. This variant is present in population databases (rs551078372, gnomAD 0.007%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BRCA1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 531443). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of variants on protein structure and function are not available or were not evaluated for this variant. Experimental studies have shown that this variant affects BRCA1 function (PMID: 30209399). Studies have shown that this variant results in activation of a cryptic splice site and introduces a new termination codon (Invitae). However the mRNA is not expected to undergo nonsense-mediated decay. In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic.
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C2936783:Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
ACMG Criteria: PM2_P; Variant was found in heterozygous state in Proband.
not provided Uncertain:1
The BRCA1 c.5407-9G>A variant has not been reported in individuals with BRCA1-related conditions in the published literature. A functional study demonstrated that this variant lost functional activity in a large-scale study using a haploid cell line (PMID: 30209399 (2018)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000004 (1/251444 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using software algorithms for the prediction of the effect of nucleotide changes on splicing yielded predictions that this variant may affect proper BRCA1 mRNA splicing. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at