chr17-43092107-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):āc.3424G>Cā(p.Ala1142Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,644 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A1142S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.3424G>C | p.Ala1142Pro | missense_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000357654.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.3424G>C | p.Ala1142Pro | missense_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461644Hom.: 0 Cov.: 39 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727136
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | This missense variant replaces alanine with proline at codon 1142 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been performed for this variant. This variant has been detected in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 2/60466 cases and 0/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA1_002535) and in a suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer family (PMID: 9333265). This variant also has been reported in a mother-daughter pair both affected with high-risk breast cancer and a BRCA2 truncation variant (PMID: 30214756). This variant also has been reported with co-occurrence and family history likelihood ratios for pathogenicity of 1.1026 and 0.0608, respectively (PMID: 31131967). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna | Sep 01, 2023 | PM2(Supporting)+BP1(Strong)+BP5(Moderate) according to ACMG/AMP classification guidelines specified for BRCA1 & BRCA2 (Classification Criteria V1.0.0 2023-09-08 - https://cspec.genome.network/cspec/ui/svi/affiliation/50087) (PMID: 38160042) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Mar 13, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | Feb 15, 1997 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Feb 15, 2023 | This missense variant replaces alanine with proline at codon 1142 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been performed for this variant. This variant has been detected in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 2/60466 cases and 0/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA1_002535) and in a suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer family (PMID: 9333265). This variant also has been reported in a mother-daughter pair both affected with high-risk breast cancer and a BRCA2 truncation variant (PMID: 30214756). This variant also has been reported with co-occurrence and family history likelihood ratios for pathogenicity of 1.1026 and 0.0608, respectively (PMID: 31131967). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 23, 2023 | The p.A1142P variant (also known as c.3424G>C), located in coding exon 9 of the BRCA1 gene, results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 3424. The alanine at codon 1142 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration has been reported in a Turkish woman with a personal history of bilateral triple negative breast cancer diagnosed at age 33 and a family history of early-onset breast cancer in her mother. This alteration was seen in conjunction with a BRCA2 truncating alteration, classified as pathogenic, and an ATM missense alteration, classified as uncertain significance (Celik E et al. Clin Case Rep, 2018 Sep;6:1751-1755). This alteration has also been reported in 1/798 individuals from a multi-center study of persons thought to be at elevated a priori risk for a BRCA1 mutation based on personal and/or family history (Shattuck-Eidens D et al. JAMA, 1997 Oct;278:1242-50). This variant was reported in 2/60,466 breast cancer cases and in 0/53,461 controls (Dorling et al. N Engl J Med 2021 02;384:428-439). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Mar 23, 2023 | Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Dec 14, 2021 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 25, 2016 | Variant summary: The BRCA1 c.3424G>C variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in amino acid change from Ala to Pro. 2/4 in-silico tools predict this variant to be benign (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was not found in 121250 control chromosomes. In addition, one clinical laboratory classified this variant as pathogenic without evidence to independently evaluate. UMD classifies the variant as a VUS. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications, nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Because of the absence of clinical information and the lack of functional studies, the variant was classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) until additional information becomes available. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 24, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at