chr17-47292422-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_000212.3(ITGB3):c.1544G>T(p.Arg515Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000248 in 1,611,450 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R515Q) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000212.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000212.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITGB3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1544G>T | p.Arg515Leu | missense | Exon 10 of 15 | ENSP00000452786.2 | P05106-1 | ||
| ENSG00000259753 | TSL:2 | n.1508G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 10 of 18 | ENSP00000456711.2 | H3BM21 | |||
| ITGB3 | c.1544G>T | p.Arg515Leu | missense | Exon 10 of 14 | ENSP00000513002.1 | P05106-2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152234Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1459216Hom.: 0 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 725372 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152234Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74378 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at