chr17-61861504-C-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):c.36G>T(p.Gly12Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00026 in 1,613,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00027 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRIP1
NM_032043.3 synonymous
NM_032043.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.206
Genes affected
BRIP1 (HGNC:20473): (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). The bound complex is important in the normal double-strand break repair function of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). This gene may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 17-61861504-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-61861504-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 136582.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=5}. Variant chr17-61861504-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.206 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | NM_032043.3 | c.36G>T | p.Gly12Gly | synonymous_variant | 2/20 | ENST00000259008.7 | NP_114432.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | ENST00000259008.7 | c.36G>T | p.Gly12Gly | synonymous_variant | 2/20 | 1 | NM_032043.3 | ENSP00000259008.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000178 AC: 27AN: 152006Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
27
AN:
152006
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000239 AC: 60AN: 251306Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000272 AC XY: 37AN XY: 135828
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
60
AN:
251306
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
135828
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000269 AC: 393AN: 1461020Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000268 AC XY: 195AN XY: 726886
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
393
AN:
1461020
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
195
AN XY:
726886
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000178 AC: 27AN: 152006Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74240
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
27
AN:
152006
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
74240
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 09, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 08, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Feb 05, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 03, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Aug 04, 2015 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group J Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Oct 26, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2023 | BRIP1: BP4, BP7 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 16, 2017 | Variant summary: The BRIP1 c.36G>T (p.Gly12Gly) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. The variant lies within a P-loop domain, a helicase domain, a helicase-like DEXD box domain, and a helicase superfamily ATP-binding domain of the protein (InterPro), though none of these domains are listed in the NCBI Conserved Domain database at the variant location. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant does not signifcantly affect ESE sites at the locus. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in the large control database ExAC in 31/121030 control chromosomes, exclusively observed in the European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.000466 (31/66568). This frequency is about 7 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRIP1 variant (0.0000625), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of European (Non-Finnish) origin. Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases have conflicting classifications for this variant, most of which are benign or likely benign (benign [2x], likely benign [3x], and uncertain significance [2x]). To our knowledge, the variant of interest has not been reported in affected individuals via publications, nor has it been evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Nov 03, 2020 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 01, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Ovarian neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Oct 26, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at