chr17-6424258-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_014336.5(AIPL1):c.*1202C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0993 in 152,238 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,429 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.099 ( 1429 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
AIPL1
NM_014336.5 3_prime_UTR
NM_014336.5 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.365
Genes affected
AIPL1 (HGNC:359): (aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein like 1) Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) is the most severe inherited retinopathy with the earliest age of onset and accounts for at least 5% of all inherited retinal diseases. Affected individuals are diagnosed at birth or in the first few months of life with nystagmus, severely impaired vision or blindness and an abnormal or flat electroretinogram. The photoreceptor/pineal-expressed gene, AIPL1, encoding aryl-hydrocarbon interacting protein-like 1, is located within the LCA4 candidate region. The encoded protein contains three tetratricopeptide motifs, consistent with chaperone or nuclear transport activity. Mutations in this gene may cause approximately 20% of recessive LCA. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
BP6
Variant 17-6424258-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-6424258-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 324582.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.24 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPL1 | NM_014336.5 | c.*1202C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 6/6 | ENST00000381129.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPL1 | ENST00000381129.8 | c.*1202C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 6/6 | 1 | NM_014336.5 | P1 | ||
AIPL1 | ENST00000250087.9 | c.*1202C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 5/5 | 1 | ||||
AIPL1 | ENST00000381128.2 | c.*2229C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 6/6 | 1 | ||||
AIPL1 | ENST00000570584.5 | c.251+9661C>T | intron_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0990 AC: 15066AN: 152120Hom.: 1419 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
15066
AN:
152120
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 44Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 28
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
44
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
28
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0993 AC: 15116AN: 152238Hom.: 1429 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0978 AC XY: 7284AN XY: 74450
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
15116
AN:
152238
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
7284
AN XY:
74450
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
240
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Retinitis Pigmentosa, Recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Leber congenital amaurosis 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at