chr17-75835871-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_199242.3(UNC13D):c.1580G>A(p.Arg527Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000155 in 1,614,050 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/23 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R527W) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_199242.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNC13D | NM_199242.3 | c.1580G>A | p.Arg527Gln | missense_variant | 18/32 | ENST00000207549.9 | NP_954712.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNC13D | ENST00000207549.9 | c.1580G>A | p.Arg527Gln | missense_variant | 18/32 | 1 | NM_199242.3 | ENSP00000207549 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152216Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000278 AC: 7AN: 251358Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000294 AC XY: 4AN XY: 135858
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000150 AC: 22AN: 1461834Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0000179 AC XY: 13AN XY: 727220
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152216Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74346
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 30, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at