Variant chr17-76470931-G-C details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2

The NM_001005498.4(RHBDF2):c.*702C>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000329 in 152,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00033 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )

Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

RHBDF2
NM_001005498.4 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.140

Variant links:

Genes affected

RHBDF2 (HGNC:20788): (rhomboid 5 homolog 2) Predicted to enable protein transporter activity. Predicted to be involved in negative regulation of protein secretion and regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway. Located in plasma membrane. Implicated in palmoplantar keratoderma-esophageal carcinoma syndrome. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

RHBDF2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 50 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
RHBDF2	NM_001005498.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.*702C>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	19/19	ENST00000675367.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
RHBDF2	ENST00000675367.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.*702C>G	3_prime_UTR_variant	19/19		NM_001005498.4	P1	Q6PJF5-2
RHBDF2	ENST00000313080.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.*702C>G	3_prime_UTR_variant	19/19	1			Q6PJF5-1
RHBDF2	ENST00000590168.5 linkuse as main transcript	n.2625C>G	non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	12/12	1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000329

AC:

AN:

152134

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0127

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000189

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

122

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000329

AC:

AN:

152134

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000363

AC XY:

AN XY:

74308

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.0127

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000189

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.000332

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Palmoplantar keratoderma-esophageal carcinoma syndrome

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.85

CADD

Benign

0.082

DANN

Benign

0.56

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over