chr17-80036674-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP7
The NM_017950.4(CCDC40):c.12G>A(p.Pro4Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000229 in 1,311,062 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P4P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017950.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- primary ciliary dyskinesia 15Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- autoimmune diseaseInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC40 | NM_017950.4 | c.12G>A | p.Pro4Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 1 of 20 | ENST00000397545.9 | NP_060420.2 | |
CCDC40 | NM_001243342.2 | c.12G>A | p.Pro4Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 1 of 18 | NP_001230271.1 | ||
CCDC40 | NM_001330508.2 | c.12G>A | p.Pro4Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 1 of 11 | NP_001317437.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 101152 AF XY: 0.00
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000229 AC: 3AN: 1311062Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000310 AC XY: 2AN XY: 644536 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at