chr17-80038176-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_Moderate
The NM_017950.4(CCDC40):c.83A>G(p.Glu28Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017950.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- primary ciliary dyskinesia 15Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- autoimmune diseaseInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCDC40 | NM_017950.4 | c.83A>G | p.Glu28Gly | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 20 | ENST00000397545.9 | NP_060420.2 | |
| CCDC40 | NM_001243342.2 | c.83A>G | p.Glu28Gly | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 18 | NP_001230271.1 | ||
| CCDC40 | NM_001330508.2 | c.83A>G | p.Glu28Gly | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 11 | NP_001317437.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 27
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
p.Glu28Gly of CCDC40: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance due to a lack of conservation across species, including mammals. Of note, four mammals have a glycine (Gly) at this position despite high nearby amino acid con servation. In addition, computational prediction tools do not suggest a high lik elihood of impact to the protein. This variant was absent from large population studies. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at