chr17-80202434-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001257970.1(CARD14):c.*10T>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.016 in 1,604,998 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 460 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001257970.1 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- mucopolysaccharidosis type 3AInheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Myriad Women’s Health, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001257970.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARD14 | TSL:1 | c.*10T>G | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 15 of 15 | ENSP00000461806.1 | Q9BXL6-2 | |||
| CARD14 | MANE Select | c.2219+14T>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000498071.1 | Q9BXL6-1 | |||
| CARD14 | TSL:1 | c.2219+14T>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000344549.2 | Q9BXL6-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0288 AC: 4379AN: 151832Hom.: 116 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0202 AC: 4956AN: 245052 AF XY: 0.0211 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0147 AC: 21321AN: 1453048Hom.: 344 Cov.: 50 AF XY: 0.0157 AC XY: 11299AN XY: 721350 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0289 AC: 4397AN: 151950Hom.: 116 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0283 AC XY: 2101AN XY: 74274 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at