chr17-8735185-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_144681.3(CCDC42):c.784G>A(p.Ala262Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000041 in 1,461,892 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_144681.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_144681.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCDC42 | NM_144681.3 | MANE Select | c.784G>A | p.Ala262Thr | missense | Exon 6 of 7 | NP_653282.2 | Q96M95-1 | |
| CCDC42 | NM_001158261.2 | c.562G>A | p.Ala188Thr | missense | Exon 5 of 6 | NP_001151733.1 | Q96M95-2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCDC42 | ENST00000293845.8 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.784G>A | p.Ala262Thr | missense | Exon 6 of 7 | ENSP00000293845.3 | Q96M95-1 | |
| CCDC42 | ENST00000539522.2 | TSL:1 | c.562G>A | p.Ala188Thr | missense | Exon 5 of 6 | ENSP00000444359.2 | Q96M95-2 | |
| CCDC42 | ENST00000857513.1 | c.784G>A | p.Ala262Thr | missense | Exon 7 of 8 | ENSP00000527572.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5AN: 251412 AF XY: 0.0000221 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000410 AC: 6AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727248 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at